8/29/2023 0 Comments Ai generated dungeon![]() ![]() Nobody ain't writing that game to make a dime, thrust me. I mean how else you can fight a dragon by flexing muscle at him, then invoke woodland creatures that will help you flex so hard the dragon will fly away in terror. Also it's every new way to do stuff, and figuring how to make it work was the actual true thing, not replicating old work. It's not reusing old work but learning from it, the end result is very different from the source. Here is the thing, here, the tools are available to everyone, that's not gated. Unfortunately we build on the shoulder of giants, and sometimes it doesn't work for us, we just lay foundation. How is any of that making it less bad? If anything I think it's worse to distribute IP that isn't yours to distribute in the first place under a license such as MIT. I'm taking your work, monetize it for my own benefit, and even allow others to do the same. Without the proof of concept, it's pretty much worthless. And without your books as a training dataset no one would give a S*** about the thing I made. Even if it took me hundreds of hours to get my side of the thing going, those hours are nothing compared to 10 years of you writing your books. Imagine you have written books for over a decade, and I make some machine learn thingy that I then train on your books to write books in the style that you wrote in, and even though all my generated books are objectively worse than yours, people think they're so bad that they are hilarious again, and my S***ty AI generated books go viral and I start a patreon to fund further stuff, and I release the thing that now is basically the "essence of your books", under MIT license, so that every stranger can do with it as they please. Unfortunately world is not fair, but we can learn mitigate that, to our benefits. Worse than that in my opinion is, when someone rips your source code from paid product and makes its own. To be fair, while I had time where that annoyed me, when MIT or relevant were used, for commercial products, but in the end, I use other contributions myself. Chromium, Blockly -> Scratch (for learning), etc. Google also contributed to range of open source products.Smarter will know how to do it effectively and cheap. We use all that tech and social media to advertise our products.People will contribute, where commitment is. For every commercial product, there are number of free alternatives.Academia uses range of sources available, to produce more sources available, as well as commercial products.But I understand implications and benefits. Mind, I am not fan of everyone data collection and spying. Search engines utilize our search results, to provide us best (well not always ) results, and translation.uses driver user collected data, for createing self driving cars, which are much cheaper than any other current alternative.Mobile devices use machine learning for super clear images, even in bad conditions.That contributed to DARPA and famous DOG series of robots. Thx to that, we got robotics and AI advanced as we have now. ROS foundation used commonly spread robotic related algorithms.CERN used machine learning, to generate scientific results in hours, which otherwise they been working for years.Write Brothers, vs Samuel Pierpont Langley (who had huge funds).But same I can argue, that someone did game faster than me, because they had funds and team, and I had only hobby part time dedication. Then some AI did same thing in few hours. The Blender comparison shows you're totally missing my point Martin_H you could argue even took you 50 years to write a book. ![]() ![]() Click to expand.Imagine you have written books for over a decade, and I make some machine learn thingy that I then train on your books to write books in the style that you wrote in, and even though all my generated books are objectively worse than yours, people think they're so bad that they are hilarious again, and my S***ty AI generated books go viral and I start a patreon to fund further stuff, and I release the thing that now is basically the "essence of your books", under MIT license, so that every stranger can do with it as they please. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |